From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Cleber Marques Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:51 PM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RES: [msmom] upgrade from opsmgr sp1 to R2 Hi Skip, Take a look on this Guy: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd362729.aspx Hope this helps, Regards. Cleber Marques Microsoft MVP | Charter Member: SCVMM & MDOP...

Read More... 13:04 - Sep 29, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:34 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Service threw an unknow exception Narenda – this looks like a bug – most of which was resolved in R2. Will you be upgrading to R2? That would be recommended. If not – then your best bet is to contact...

Read More... 10:50 - Sep 29, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Schleicher, Bob Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:04 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Generic Text Log Alerting... We had a similar issue too. We did open a case with Microsoft and they replied it was still an issue. The file we were trying to monitor would be renamed or deleted once every 24 hours...

Read More... 11:31 - Sep 28, 2009

-----Original Message----- From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 6:29 PM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [msmom] Exchange 2003 management pack configuration Get the rights to create the disabled user accounts for the test mailboxes in the default location (user container) then move the disabled user accounts...

Read More... 18:38 - Sep 25, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:20 PM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Consolidator Module Failed Initialization This is attributed to OpsMgr SP1, and the converted SCCM management pack. J There were some updates to the consolidator module in R2 – which I believe addressed some...

Read More... 13:47 - Sep 25, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:08 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: MonitoringHost.exe 100% Yes. This is also documented on my blog: http://blogs.technet.com/kevinholman/archive/2009/07/20/do-you-randomly-see-a-monitoringhost-exe-process-consuming-lots-of-cpu.aspx http://blogs.technet...

Read More... 13:47 - Sep 25, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:12 PM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: when this alert is raised then I need to restart the service on that particular server automatically through SCOM You are correct. If this is a sealed MP – you wont be able to add any responses to that rule –...

Read More... 13:47 - Sep 25, 2009

When the RMS in a "grey" state - it means there is a problem with the HealthService on the RMS. The best way to find out what the issue is - is to run Health Explorer against the Windows Computer object of the RMS, and the HealthService object of the RMS, and determine what it in an error state. Next - look at all Warning and Error events in the OpsMgr event log of the RMS, and research these...

Read More... 10:37 - Sep 25, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:54 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Monitor virtual server VMWARE There are no issues with monitoring a Windows 2000 virtual machine hosted by VMware. We treat the OS as a stand-alone machine, with no relation to the ESX host. The windows 2000 VM just...

Read More... 12:59 - Sep 24, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:39 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Generic Text Log Alerting... Brad – if I recall correctly – the rollover is something we had a problem with…. I believe we had problems monitoring SMS/SCCM log files at one time for this same reason...

Read More... 12:59 - Sep 24, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:33 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: selecting Agent instead of Windows server option My recommendation is to create groups of ‘Windows Computer” objects for this, as most classes are contained by or have a relationship to Windows Computer...

Read More... 12:59 - Sep 24, 2009

OK, first order of biz - RAIDQ configs - SCOM From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:00 PM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: OK, first order of biz - RAIDQ configs - SCOM First – I’d like to say – you really should not plan an application deployment by saying “this is...

Read More... 19:29 - Sep 23, 2009

From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:15 AM To: msmom@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [msmom] RE: Full Trust Domain Monitoring. Hi, You need to read the SCOM deployment guide that is available from the Microsoft TechNet website: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310604.aspx SCOM 2007 requires mutual...

Read More... 12:47 - Sep 22, 2009

How long's ya action account name? Think I had a problem with a few accounts during install because I had gone over the 20 character pre-Windows 2000 logon name limit in Active Directory and it was truncated. Might want to double check something dumb like that. From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin@lists.myITforum.com] On Behalf Of wgerow@samhealth.org Sent: 21 September 2009 22:42 To:...

Read More... 06:26 - Sep 22, 2009

Please go and look on the client to see why the client is unable to complete the installation or unable to communicate with your management server (e.g. port is blocked by firewall). Also, if the domain is in another Forest, then you need a Forest trust between the two Forests for Kerberos authentication to work. External trust is not sufficient. Cheers Ken From: admin@lists.myITforum.com [mailto:admin...

Read More... 06:26 - Sep 22, 2009

More Posts Next page »