<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>lionel</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP2 (Build: 31113.47)</generator><item><title>MSFT May 2012 Security Patch for Silverlight - MS012-034 KB2690729 is replaced by MS012-034 KB2636927</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/05/10/msft-may-2012-security-patch-for-silverlight-ms012-034-kb2690729-is-replaced-by-ms012-034-kb2636927.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:161105</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=161105</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/05/10/msft-may-2012-security-patch-for-silverlight-ms012-034-kb2690729-is-replaced-by-ms012-034-kb2636927.aspx#comments</comments><description>Had a little discovery today when we realised possibly the fastest replacement of a KB Article ever, (almost instantly!). http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-034 It appears that the following behaviour is experienced when you perform...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/05/10/msft-may-2012-security-patch-for-silverlight-ms012-034-kb2690729-is-replaced-by-ms012-034-kb2636927.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=161105" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Configmgr+2007/default.aspx">Configmgr 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/security+bulletin/default.aspx">security bulletin</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/MS12-034/default.aspx">MS12-034</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/kb2636927/default.aspx">kb2636927</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/kb2690729/default.aspx">kb2690729</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/silverlight/default.aspx">silverlight</category></item><item><title>System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SDK (Prerelease)</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/04/18/system-center-2012-configuration-manager-sdk-prerelease.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:160999</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=160999</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/04/18/system-center-2012-configuration-manager-sdk-prerelease.aspx#comments</comments><description>For all of those interested, the ConfigMgr 2012 SDK is now available! http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh948960.aspx Worth also knowing these features are now no longer supported. Unsupported Features The Configuration Manager console does not...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/04/18/system-center-2012-configuration-manager-sdk-prerelease.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/SDK/default.aspx">SDK</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Configmgr+2012/default.aspx">Configmgr 2012</category></item><item><title>Logo for Windows 8!</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/02/20/logo-for-windows-8.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:160703</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=160703</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/02/20/logo-for-windows-8.aspx#comments</comments><description>Hey, check this out! Certainly looks a little &amp;#39;Metro-ish!&amp;#39; http://asia.cnet.com/crave/microsoft-unveils-new-windows-8-logo-62213516.htm Read More......(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2012/02/20/logo-for-windows-8.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160703" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Windows+8+Logo/default.aspx">Windows 8 Logo</category></item><item><title>MSFT Rereleases MS11-037 - KB2544893</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/09/msft-rereleases-ms11-037-kb2544893.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:160099</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=160099</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/09/msft-rereleases-ms11-037-kb2544893.aspx#comments</comments><description>It&amp;#39;s that tuesday of the month again! 1 key ponit to note is the reoffering of MS11-037. This rerelease only affects editions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003, as seen from the following Microsoft link and extract. As a form of best practice...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/09/msft-rereleases-ms11-037-kb2544893.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160099" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/security+bulletin/default.aspx">security bulletin</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Novemeber+2011+security+patches/default.aspx">Novemeber 2011 security patches</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/KB2544893/default.aspx">KB2544893</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/MS11-037/default.aspx">MS11-037</category></item><item><title>A run through of the infamous Windows Task Manager</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/07/a-run-through-of-the-infamous-windows-task-manager.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:160059</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=160059</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/07/a-run-through-of-the-infamous-windows-task-manager.aspx#comments</comments><description>Hey chaps, I&amp;#39;ve been silent a long while as a lot of things happened between August and now. Computer failing on me, internet problems at home and travels and holidays and all those madness in getting a new box to replace the failed one. I hope to...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/11/07/a-run-through-of-the-infamous-windows-task-manager.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160059" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Windows+8+Task+manager/default.aspx">Windows 8 Task manager</category></item><item><title>There's something about "Side by Side" KB2507938... UPDATE!!</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938-update.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:158893</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=158893</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938-update.aspx#comments</comments><description>Microsoft has addressed the issue now with the release of the August 2011 Security updates. More details can be found in the original article, which has now been updated with a resolution. http://wmug.co.uk/blogs/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/07/20/there...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938-update.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=158893" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/KB2507938/default.aspx">KB2507938</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/KB2567680/default.aspx">KB2567680</category></item><item><title>Epic Crash at home</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/epic-crash-at-home.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:158894</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=158894</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/epic-crash-at-home.aspx#comments</comments><description>Dear Readers, I must apologise first for not posting as much as I would have like to over the last few weeks. My Asus RoG Laptop went silent 2 weeks ago. It has to be sent back to Singapore for some urgent repairs and hopefully it wakes up again... In...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/08/17/epic-crash-at-home.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=158894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/fridge/default.aspx">fridge</category></item><item><title>There's something about "Side by Side" KB2507938...</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:158519</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=158519</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938.aspx#comments</comments><description>Some knowledge in case you experience these issues. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2507938 After the installation of the security update, several windows adminstrators have noticed entries into event viewer that indicate that a SideBySide error has occured...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=158519" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/July+2011+security+patches/default.aspx">July 2011 security patches</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/conhost.exe/default.aspx">conhost.exe</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sidebyside/default.aspx">sidebyside</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/KB2507938/default.aspx">KB2507938</category></item><item><title>2010 - 2011 YTD MS Security Bulletin Graphs</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/2010-2011-ytd-ms-security-bulletin-graphs.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:158520</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=158520</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/2010-2011-ytd-ms-security-bulletin-graphs.aspx#comments</comments><description>The return of the graphs! I&amp;#39;ve done a quick and simple summary. Some interesting statistics to note is that for the first 7 months of 2011, 56 bulletins were released. In the same period last year, that was 43, so just an increase of...13 bulletins...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/07/20/2010-2011-ytd-ms-security-bulletin-graphs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=158520" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/security+bulletin/default.aspx">security bulletin</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/graph/default.aspx">graph</category></item><item><title>Thou shall not assign your Configmgr Site Codes with these...</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/06/03/thou-shall-not-assign-your-configmgr-site-codes-with-these.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:157873</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=157873</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/06/03/thou-shall-not-assign-your-configmgr-site-codes-with-these.aspx#comments</comments><description>Something we may forget when assigning a site code within our Configmgr hierarchy. Although Configmgr will install happily with these names, it is recommended to avoid using these Windows reserved names. There are many other combinations you can use anyway...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/06/03/thou-shall-not-assign-your-configmgr-site-codes-with-these.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=157873" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Configmgr+2007/default.aspx">Configmgr 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Reserver+names/default.aspx">Reserver names</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/site+codes/default.aspx">site codes</category></item><item><title>Install software updates action hangs on Windows 7 - UPDATE!</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/18/install-software-updates-action-hangs-on-windows-7-update.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:157651</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=157651</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/18/install-software-updates-action-hangs-on-windows-7-update.aspx#comments</comments><description>I&amp;#39;ve updated the original entry (3rd Feb) now that MS has released a hotfix. http://wmug.co.uk/blogs/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/02/03/install-software-updates-action-hangs-on-windows-7.aspx Read More......(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/18/install-software-updates-action-hangs-on-windows-7-update.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=157651" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft buys Skype</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/11/microsoft-buys-skype.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 16:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:157446</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=157446</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/11/microsoft-buys-skype.aspx#comments</comments><description>Here we are, straight from the horse&amp;#39;s mouth http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2011/may11/05-10CorpNewsPR.mspx So, folks here all geared up for the next MS Security Bulletin that will be applicable for Skype? :) Read More......(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/11/microsoft-buys-skype.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=157446" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/microsoft/default.aspx">microsoft</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Skype/default.aspx">Skype</category></item><item><title>Using SCCM to manage clients in a workgroup or untrusted domain (DMZ etc..)</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/04/using-sccm-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-untrusted-domain-dmz-etc.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 06:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:157286</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=157286</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/04/using-sccm-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-untrusted-domain-dmz-etc.aspx#comments</comments><description>Many people do struggle a little (maybe!) when coming to configuring and managing SCCM clients in a workgroup, DMZ, untrusted domain. Many big words, jargons are thrown around, LMHosts, Registry keys, SRV records, DNS Suffixes and the list goes on!! Found...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/04/using-sccm-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-untrusted-domain-dmz-etc.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=157286" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm+client/default.aspx">sccm client</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/workgroup/default.aspx">workgroup</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/untrusted+domain/default.aspx">untrusted domain</category></item><item><title>Checking Patch Statuses through WMI</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/02/checking-patch-statuses-through-wmi.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:157181</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=157181</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/02/checking-patch-statuses-through-wmi.aspx#comments</comments><description>Normally the optimal and quickest way to determine if a patch has definitely been installed on a system is to use WMI. That&amp;#39;s where the SCCM client primarily gets its information from to report back to its parent. There are several ways you can go...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/05/02/checking-patch-statuses-through-wmi.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=157181" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Software+Updates/default.aspx">Software Updates</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/wql/default.aspx">wql</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/wmi/default.aspx">wmi</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/CCM_5F00_UpdateStatus/default.aspx">CCM_UpdateStatus</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/Wbemtest/default.aspx">Wbemtest</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category></item><item><title>Collection Query to return systems before a specific Install / Creation Date</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/04/21/collection-query-to-return-systems-before-a-specific-install-creation-date.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:156869</guid><dc:creator>Lionel's configmgr blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=156869</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/04/21/collection-query-to-return-systems-before-a-specific-install-creation-date.aspx#comments</comments><description>When creating a query that returns systems before a specific date in a collection, you may get no system records back if you had done the query like the following: Incorrect Query SELECT SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name...(&lt;a href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/2011/04/21/collection-query-to-return-systems-before-a-specific-install-creation-date.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=156869" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sccm/default.aspx">sccm</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/sql+query/default.aspx">sql query</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/datetime/default.aspx">datetime</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/lionel/archive/tags/collection+query/default.aspx">collection query</category></item></channel></rss>