<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://myitforum.com/cs2/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Jeff Huston at myITforum.com : Server OS</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/Server+OS/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Server OS</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP2 (Build: 31113.47)</generator><item><title>Adapting BDD 2007 for Server OS Deployment</title><link>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/2007/01/23/adapting-bdd-2007-for-server-os-deployment.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e8f7986-475c-475d-bdc9-a1b3a63b955b:91314</guid><dc:creator>jhuston</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=91314</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/2007/01/23/adapting-bdd-2007-for-server-os-deployment.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;P&gt;For the past year or more, we have been using the automation in BDD 2.5 to deploy our server operating systems.&amp;nbsp; This has been a great deployment tool for us and I'm looking forward to adapting BDD 2007 to this same purpose.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Deploying a server OS is very similar to a workstation OS, but is usually done with more interaction (such as the Lite-Touch scenario).&amp;nbsp; Because our environment encompasses several domains, I'm still interested in the SMS OSD automation component of the Zero-Touch scenario.&amp;nbsp; I'm attempting to mold the two together in a meaningful way.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As I learn more, I'll post some notes for how I've customized BDD 2007 for this purpose.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps the Microsoft folks will take a listen that many admins do not want to have multiple build, image, and deploy technologies but, instead, want a more unified approach to deploying all flavors of the operating systems available from Microsoft.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://myitforum.com/cs2/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91314" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/SMS/default.aspx">SMS</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/Guidance/default.aspx">Guidance</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/BDD+2007/default.aspx">BDD 2007</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/Server+OS/default.aspx">Server OS</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/BDD+2.5/default.aspx">BDD 2.5</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/Automation/default.aspx">Automation</category><category domain="http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jhuston/archive/tags/Deployment/default.aspx">Deployment</category></item></channel></rss>