When I posted information related to the mozilla vulnerability, I wanted first and foremost to make Mozilla users aware, so they could take proper action.
With that said, I secretly thought it might get Rod fired up after all of his previous posts. I had no idea it would get Chris' attention. I have used most of the well known browsers including Internet explorer (Cant help but to use that one), FireFox, Avant, and Opera. I must say that I do like tabbed browsing, and I wish that FireFox opened new windows tabbed. From a security standpoint, I do not like the idea of people claiming that FireFox is the “secure browser”. That would be like Harley Davidson saying they have the “Safe Motorcycle”. You have the potential to get injured on all motorcycles, just like you have the potential to be affected by vulnerabilities associated with all browsers.
Here are vulnerability lists from Secunia for several browsers:
Mozilla
Avant
Opera
Internet Explorer
I like motorcycles, so that is why I am using them as an example. One might argue that motorcycle X is involved in fewer accidents that all of the rest, therefore motorcycle X is the safest. I’m willing to bet that someone is going to say that browser X has a lower number of vulnerabilities and is more secure. If you jump to that conclusion, you are missing my point. There is a potential for accidents to occur on all motorcycles, just as there is a potential that your system could be compromised while using any internet browser. I think it is irresponsible to bill a browser as the “safe browser”.
There is another issue I am concerned with. I am a firm believer of the KISS principle. (Keep It Simple Stoopid, for those that are not on the same planet as us) The more services running on a system, the higher the probability is that your system is vulnerable to attack. I think the same goes for adding a second browser. You now have two browsers (Internet Explorer, which is embedded in the OS, and the second browser you added) that you have to worry about having potential security issues with. You now have two browsers to patch when a security vulnerability is discovered.
Adding to the conflict, from an administration standpoint in an enterprise environment, I have not seen a product to manage the other browsers from a central location. For Internet Explorer, as least you can use Group Policy to adjust settings for the browser.
I recommend that home users use whatever browser they like best, but be sure to update both.
I recommend that enterprise administrators consider manageability, and the fact that there is an inherent risk associated with using any Internet Browser, when making decisions on which browser is right for your organization.
Anyway, thats my two cents.
P.S. I hope Rod doesnt have me down as a marked man now ; )