in

myITforum.com

This Blog

Syndication

1E Blog

Empowering Efficient IT

March 2010 - Posts

  • Post Copenhagen 2009: Where are we now?

    After the almost farcical show of global inter-government apathy that was COP15 in Copenhagen last year, many people (including myself) were left wondering just where we go now in our efforts to mitigate climate change by reducing our carbon emissions. Within the business world, it seemed that everyone you speak to has a different view, opinion and strategy, and confusion, it would seem, rules.

    With this in mind, 1E, along with IBM, Hitachi and the Carbon Trust funded a comprehensive report into the state of play, and it seems that climate change action is stalling. The report, based on a survey carried out by the Economist Intelligence Unit, polled 542 company executives covering a range of questions. You can download the full report for free here:- www.eiu.com/sponsor/aftercopenhagen but here are what I think are some key points.

    • Efforts on climate change have stalled over the past year, neither advancing nor retreating. One in two companies (49%) globally has a coherent strategy to address issues related to climate change, slightly down on the proportion from a year ago (54%). However, the proportion of firms that are also engaging both their external partners and their supply chains in this strategy shows a starker decline, at 10% in 2010 compared with 17% the previous year. Those acting on climate change tend to be larger, publicly-listed firms.
    •  Executives remain convinced, however, that there are significant business benefits to be gained. Nearly half (45%) of executives agree that their companies see carbon emission reduction as a way to gain competitive advantage by cutting costs. The economic downturn has not materially damaged these efforts: of those who made a change to their existing focus (if any) on carbon reduction, 26% are doing more, especially in terms of energy efficiency, compared with 11% that are doing less. Fifty-nine per cent say their companies see carbon reduction as a way to obtain advantage through new products and services.
    • Business has less confidence than ever in the ability of governments to deliver a level regulatory playing field. Nearly one-half (46%) of those polled are now more pessimistic about the ability of their government to deal with climate change, especially in an international context.
    • PR considerations are still the most common driver of carbon reduction efforts. More than one-third (35%) of executives say that climate change is always taken into account in public relations (PR) efforts.

    I think that one of the most worrying trends to emerge from this report is that the rise in public scepticism about man-made climate change is now strongly echoed in the business world. More than one-half (52%) of executives agree that conflicting evidence on climate change means the jury is still out on how serious this issue is. Just 31% disagree.

    “Climate change action by business has stalled over the past year and skepticism is on the rise,” comments James Watson, Managing Editor, Economist Intelligence Unit. “But regardless of individual views on climate change, business leaders are looking for clarity on national and international regulations, so that they can compete on a level playing field. In the absence of that, only a relative minority are willing to pursue the potential competitive advantages of early action on carbon reduction.”

    So, where does this leave us? Personally, I think that we're missing the point in a huge way. Regardless of wether you choose to believe the data arounf man made climate change, the fact is that we are currently consuming more resource than we have. That surely cannot be disputed. So why would you want to carry on regardless? There are huge savings to be made out there.

    I think my friend and 1E CEO Sumir Karayi summed things up rather well.

    “Organisations have a duty – more than just a moral obligation - to become more energy efficient,” he says. “Green IT initiatives can actually save organizations money - this should be the key driver, above and beyond reputation.  We recommend a modular approach to a company-wide sustainability strategy which identifies the ‘quick wins’ that can be achieved today – such as a PC power management project which can save organizations up to £22 per PC per year in energy savings.”

  • The $20 Million Server

    Space is becoming more of a valuable commodity in data centers. With the lack of affordable ground space, over-stretched power grids and tightening efficiency legislation, building a new data center is often not an option. Consider the New York area where I live. Clearly there is a huge demand for high-tech and this means servers and data centers, however, whilst there is the infrastructure to build a data center on the banks of the Hudson, the area lacks both the physical space and the grid capacity to support one. In fact, the New York city metro area is significantly over capacity at present which has caused a noticeable impact on service, most severe on August 14th in 2003 when the already strained power grid was brought to it’s knees by a suspected system failure somewhere in Ontario, Canada. Generators from the North-East United States; including New York, tried in vain to shunt power westward to the affected areas causing a widespread blackout of Ontario, the North-East US, and parts of Michigan and Ohio.

    To further confirm the observation that the New York metro grid is strained, it was reported that in the summer of 2004 New York City’s peak energy load was 11,150MW whilst the physical capacity on the grid was a mere 8,940MW and in addition, it is known, that due to constraints with the transmission lines, the vast majority of power for New York City must be generated within the city limits during peak times which does not provide a great deal of slack. Worst of all, the New York City and Long Island zones' electricity generating infrastructure has the highest average age of generating units in the state and is still highly dependent on an aging fleet of combustion and gas turbine plants bringing its long-term reliability into question.

    These factors all combine to produce the $20 million server effect or the one server that simply cannot fit in a full-to-capacity facility and therefore is the catalyst for building a new data center. A large number of companies are very reactive in terms of their capacity and often, due to a combination of cost, complexity and sometimes I’m sure, an element of denial, new facilities are built on-demand rather than in advance. Instead of allocating budget, sourcing planning permission, carrying out the design work and breaking ground on a new data center before the extra capacity is needed, often projects that require new infrastructure tip the balance of capacity over the edge and the building of a new data center becomes a knee-jerk reaction instead of a proactive exercise. The $20 million server becomes a reality.

    So how can this be avoided? Considering the challenges of actually locating and building a datacenter, making more efficient use of what you have is, in many cases, a much better and more cost effective option. Technologies such as ‘virtualization’ and ‘cloud computing’ can help to relieve the burden on over stressed facilities. In addition, gaining visibility into the consumption and efficiency of servers is an important component is building up a picture of wasted resources. Knowing whether or not a server is ‘useful’ enables the business to make more informed decisions about reallocation of hardware to reclaim precious space and capacity in the data center.

    1E’s NightWatchman Server Edition visualizes server ‘useful work’ and is the seek and destroy tool for virtual machine sprawl...say goodbye to the $20 million server and hello to a more efficient data center. 

  • Interesting thoughts from our CEO

    Our CEO Sumir Karayi was interviewed for the TIBCO blog earlier this week - TIBCO are makers of Spotfire Business Intelligence and Analytics software.

    I thought I'd link to it here as it's an interesting insight into the thoughts and processes behind NightWatchman Server , including how we define waste in a data center and why we should do something about it.

    Here it is - http://spotfireblog.tibco.com/?p=2038

  • Helping Ford save a Million and more..

    I'm unashamed to say that there's nothing better than being able to show real tangible savings in a great customer case study. And we happen to have one right here!

    We've been working with Ford Motor Company for some time, with a view to implementing a PC Power Management solution based around NightWatchman that would reduce their (quite enormous) power bill. So now the big red 'go' button has been pushed, here's the breakdown.

    The system works by using a Power Profile for each type of PC in the business. All departments tend to work differently, including the use of different applications, work hours etc so you can't just go around blindly shutting down all computers at 5:30 in the hope that everyone has gone home!

    The following diagram neatly illustrates the type of schedule that Ford are using:

    The key point here is that alonside the considerable power savings that are being made by shutting down PC's when they are not is use, is the availability of those computers for overnight updates such as patches etc. This is absolutely key in ensuring that your desktops are managed and updated as well as saving as much energy as possible.

    In order to do this, Ford use 1E Wakeup to power on computers according to their maintenance schedule, and then power them off again to maximise those savings. All of this happens when the user is not present which of course is the perfect time for such activities.

    Those savings

    Ford exepct to save $1.2 million in power costs using our solution, which equates to 25,000 tons of carbon emissions, which in turn equates to around 5,000 cars taken off the road per year! This PC Power Management project is part of Ford's overall drive to reduce energy efficiency across the business, which it says has improved by 35% since 2000. Ford is also an Energy Star partner and has been recognised no less than five times for it's efforts in energy efficiency.

     

  • Are Tradable Energy Quotas a Viable Alternative to Carbon Trading?

    This week I've been re-visiting some of our older blog content - namely Michelle Hazelton's excellent tour around CAP and Trade and the EU's Carbon Trading solutions. Opinions around these solutions vary, but I would say that there is generally more bad press than good as far as I can see. Maybe it's just my inbuilt mistrust of any program that comes from government these days (banking anyone?), but Carbon Trading as a means to reducing greenhouse gas emissions just doesn't seem to be working.

    What's wrong with good old Carbon Trading?

    The problem with carbon trading is that there just seems to be too many allowances handed out. This brings down the price of a ton of carbon to a level where the whole scheme just has no teeth whatsoever. Loopholes are many too. Recently the Guardian newspaper reported that some companies are hoarding their EU credits, while buying up cheaper one from developing nations. The end result is that it’s just too easy for these companies to keep on keeping on.Articles such as this one regarding the estimated £1Bn which stands to be made by Britain’s richest man from excess carbon credits don't help the Carbon Trading PR cause either.

    So Give us an Alternative Then!

    So as ever I started to trawl around for alternative solutions (there is always an alternative solution to absolutely everything on the internet). Almost immediately I came across Tradable Energy Quotas or TEQs. I can't believe I hadn't seen this sooner - the idea here is blindingly simple. A brainchild (love that word!) of David Fleming, TEQs is an energy rationing system to enable nations to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases along with their use of oil, gas and coal, and to ensure fair access to energy for all.
    This fits in with our philosophy at 1E - which is the promotion of energy conservation, rather than trying to keep up with an ever increasing demand. A visit to the TEQs website also reveals some great information around Nuclear Energy too. Nuclear Power is being touted as one way to boost energy production as an alternative to using fossil fuels, and the Nuclear industry seems very keen to sell it to us as a 'low carbon' or even 'carbon neutral' solution. A quick read of the excellent document on Nuclear Energy soon dispelled that myth for me however..

    So how do TEQs work? Well essentially it's a rationing system, and I use the term rationing deliberately here, although it may well cause panic in members of the older generation here in the UK who remember food rationing of the Second World War and beyond. I believe that energy rationing may well be the only way to truly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, with Peak Oil looming larger each year the sooner we start the better. Government scaremongering campaigns simply don't work in persuading us to drive less, save energy or throw away less food, but if we were all given an energy allowance it would achieve two things at least, namely raising awareness that energy is a finite resource, and also encouraging everyone to use less of it for fear of running out of allowance. Here's how it works in more detail:

    TEQs (pronounced "tex") are measured in units.
     
    1. Every adult is given an equal free Entitlement of TEQs units. Industry and Government bid for their units at a weekly Tender.
     
    2. At the start of the scheme, a full year's supply of units is placed on the market. Then, every week, the number of units in the market is topped up with a week's supply.
     
    3. If you use less than your Entitlement of units, you can sell your surplus. If you need more, you can buy them.
     
    4. All fuels (and electricity) carry a "rating" in units; one unit represents one kilogram of carbon dioxide, or the equivalent in other greenhouse gases, released when the fuel is used.
     
    5. When you buy energy, such as petrol for your car or electricity for your household, units corresponding to the amount of energy you have bought are deducted from your TEQs account, in addition to your money payment. TEQs transactions are automatic, using credit-card or (more usually) direct-debit technology.
     
    6. The number of units available on the market is set out in the TEQs Budget, which looks 20 years ahead. The size of the Budget goes down year-by-year - step-by-step, like a staircase.
     
    7. The Budget is set by the Energy Policy Committee, which is independent of the Government.
     
    8. The Government is itself bound by the scheme; its role is to find ways of living within it, and to help the rest of us to do so.
     
    9. TEQs are a national scheme, enabling nations to keep their promises, guaranteeing their carbon reduction commitments within whatever international framework applies at the time. 


    I do love the simplicity of this idea, and the fact that it's not just carbon centric,  but will it work? I'm not so sure. Politically I wouldn't like to be the guy who introduces rationing of any kind at a personal level, especially one that is likely to decrease year on year. I also think that the scheme is a little naive in the way it treats industry. However I do love the idea and in the longer term what is the alternative? There's no question that we have to seriously curtail our runaway use of the world's resources, and the longer we leave things, the more likely a rationing scenario of some kind becomes..

    If you want to know more about TEQs you can download the full paper from the website here.

     

  • The Bad Kind of Sprawl

    When I hear the word ‘sprawl’, I always think of stretching out by the pool on a lazy day in the sun, clutching a mojito or lying in bed late on a Saturday. That is the good kind of sprawl. However, there is an altogether more sinister use of the word. I am referring to the emerging issue of virtual machine sprawl.

    In recent years, a number of new technologies have emerged in an effort to slow the growth in the number of servers and to make server provisioning, management and monitoring easier and more efficient. The most prevalent of these new technologies is Virtualization.

    In simple terms, virtualization is the concept of containing many ‘servers’ within a single physical box. Imagine putting shoeboxes within a single, larger box. Anything you place in the shoebox will be inherently contained within the large box but will be separate from something located in another shoebox. This idea is effectively how virtualization works. Each ‘virtual server’ is allocated a portion of the physical machine and is separated from both the physical hardware, the operating system running on the hardware and other virtual machines by a layer called a ‘Hypervisor’. The basic concept of virtualization is shown in the image below:

    virtualization

    Virtualization was designed with the intention of reducing cost and complexity of provisioning and maintaining servers in the datacenter. Firstly, you can have many servers running on a single piece of hardware, and since space is a valuable commodity in the datacenter and cooling is expensive, it reduces the demand on floor space and infrastructure. Secondly, since there is no need to provision hardware every time a server is needed, the process for building a new server is greatly simplified and accelerated. Also, management of these virtual machines is made easier using proprietary tools that are often provided with the virtualization solution such as VMWare’s vCenter and Microsoft’s System Center Virtual Machine Manager.

    However, with any new technology comes challenges, and whilst virtualization has been hailed by some as the ‘silver bullet’ to resolve power and space concerns in the datacenter, it brings with it its own inherent problems; one of which is virtual machine sprawl.

    Virtual machine sprawl refers to the result of poor provisioning and management of a virtual environment where many virtual machines are created and configured, and then are simply forgotten about. The environment sprawls out of control and the snowball effect takes over. The more virtual machines that exist, the more difficult it is to manage and find unused virtual machines. Instead of re-using machines, another is created and the cycle perpetuates. This is virtual machine sprawl.

    Of course, this doesn’t happen overnight but the biggest concern is not that it is happening, but that many users of virtualization are simply not aware of it. So the next question is ‘How does it happen?’

    Virtual machines are quick to provision and often at seemingly ‘no cost’ to the application owner and end user. This mindset leads to virtual machine sprawl. If we compare the process for provisioning a physical server with that of creating a new virtual machine, the situation becomes clearer. Provisioning a new physical server is often laborious and time consuming and can look similar to the following:

    1. Justify purchase of server
    2. Raise PO
    3. Place hardware order
    4. Hardware manufacturer builds/picks server
    5. Server shipped to datacenter
    6. Unpack server and rack
    7. Patch network and power and run cables
    8. Build Operating System
    9. Patch Operating System and install management software
    10. Hand over to application owner

    As you can see, there are a lot of steps here and this is by no means an exhaustive list. In addition, some of these steps can take a considerable amount of time to complete, often resulting in the process taking several months. Not to mention the added complexity of finding space and power in datacenters that in some cases are nearing capacity.

    Now let’s compare that to the process for building a virtual machine:

    1. Create Virtual Machine
    2. Take coffee break
    3. Hand over to application owner

    Of course, this list is being somewhat flippant but at the same time, this idea that virtual machines can be created quickly and at little or no cost often leads to virtual machines being created for testing, application development and expanding production applications and not being repurposed or deleted when no longer used. This, in turn, leads to an increase in management overhead, increased hardware demands on the physical hosts and unnecessary licensing costs for machines that are not in use.

    If virtual machine sprawl it’s not addressed, it can have catastrophic impact on cost. Boeing recently commented to Gartner that they believed that their savings through virtualization could be entirely wiped out if virtual machine sprawl is not controlled.

    1E’s NightWatchman Server Edition helps to visualize virtual machine sprawl and helps companies to gain a handle on the problem, enabling them to realize the greatest benefit and ROI from their virtualization solution through efficient use of technology.

  • Smart Buildings and Smart IT - Can They Work Together?

    When we first started to develop NightWatchman for desktop computers, it rapidly became clear that the potential for energy savings within most organizations was huge. You only had to wander through the streets of any major city after dark (as we often like to do here at 1E) and bathe in the glow of lights of all shapes and sizes. Energy was cheap, and it's easy to put energy efficiency to the bottom of your to-do list when it's not affecting your bottom line.

    Then things started to change. As energy prices rose, so did the awareness of some savvy IT managers, as the vision of endless banks of vacant desks illuminated by screens suddenly equated to dollars which were coming out of their dwindling budgets.
    However, one thing that always puzzled me was the lack of joined up thinking beyond the obvious realms of PC and eventually Server and datacenter management, and the guys who run the other facilities such as HVAC , lights, water.. After all, it's all energy right?

    We often used to come up against a brick wall of an objection to computer power management in the form of an IT boss who would usually resort to something along the lines of 'We don't pay the power bill so why should we care about saving electricity in this department?' Good Point! Recently however I've been catching snippets of stories that seem to indicate that things are finally changing. The question that still remains for me however is 'can company wide energy management programs ever work'?

    Recent announcement by some fairly large players seem to suggest that some people think that is can.

    As Heather Clancy from  SmartPlanet recently reported, IBM and CICSCO are both launching initiatives that will see IT solutions such as IBM's Tivoli integrated with specialists in the sphere of buildings management such as Johnson Controls. The objective of these endeavours is to create solutions which will bring all energy management programs under one company wide project.  The end result should be Smart everything - buildings, IT, transport, you name it it will be smart..

    What's also important too is the overall emissions reporting. It's no use implementing all of this smart energy saving kit is you can't quantify the savings, so IBM and Johnson Controls are working to include carbon reporting into the whole solution.

    Even on a smaller scale, buildings managers who are implementing energy savings projects are actually having to  talk to the guys in  down in the basement in IT (poor souls!), after finally realizing the savings possible and the fact that PC and Server Power Management solutions like NightWatchman can make a huge contribution to overall savings companywide. In fact it would be great to see IT and Buildings management integrated by the likes of the  US Green Buildings Council. This would truly add some traction to the cause by fully incorporating computer power management into their LEED certification program

    We think that this is an interesting space to watch in 2010, as more players realise the potential for partnering with other best of breed energy management providers in order to create solutions that are ultimately more attractive to corporates who are looking to save energy whether it be for financial, legislative or even moral reasons. And while I am not usually a proponent of bigger is better, I think that the sooner energy management is taken seriously on a huge scale by the likes of IBM, CISCO, Power Companies and governments the better.

    IBM Green Buildings

    CICSCO Smart Connected Real Estate

    Johnson Controls

     

     

  • Whitepaper - The CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme

    Yet another quality whitepaper drops of the production line here at 1E central! Hot off the press, here's the scoop....

     In this paper, Michelle Hazelton gives us the lowdown on the new UK Government CRC Scheme - and how 1E's NightWatchman solutions can help.

    As ever this is a really useful document regardless of whether your company will be part of the scheme or not. If you are at all interested (and you should be!) in saving energy in your PC and server populations, take half an hour out and read this.

    Excerpt from the doc: The CRC is a mandatory carbon emissions trading scheme for all organisations using more than 6000MWh of electricity per year, equivalent to an energy bill of more than £500k. The policy has been developed with the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and is aligned to the Energy Act 2008 and the Climate Change Act 2008. It is due to come into force in April 2010 and an estimated 20,000 organisations will be affected by it; failure to comply resulting in financial penalties. This document gives an overview of the scheme with key dates. It also looks at how 1E solutions can help participant organisations to prepare and comply. Using power management software with intelligent reporting capabilities in server and PC environments can greatly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. Since its inception NightWatchman, 1E’s PC power management solution, has cumulatively saved its customers 2.7million tonnes of CO2 emissions.

    Download the full Whitepaper here

     

Copyright - www.myITforum.com, Inc. - 2010 All Rights reserved.
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems